|
July 15, 2010
OCC BARGAINING UNIT EMPLOYEES
A LONG AND
WINDING ROAD..........
Negotiability for Pay and Benefits
Having operated
under basically Civil War legislation, it appears we may be
seeing transparency at the end of the tunnel once President
Obama signs The Dodd-Frank Wall
Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. There is
considerable work yet to be done just to implement this
legislation and the jury is still out as to the full impact it
will have on our agency. Still, when it comes to negotiating
salary and benefits, the employees finally have a seat at the
table.
How it happened?
For almost eight
years, NTEU has been pursuing the right to negotiate pay and
benefits at the OCC. The new financial regulatory reform now
makes this goal a reality.
Many employees who
have not been with the OCC through this period may not fully
appreciate the uphill battle we waged. The NTEU at the OCC was
formally recognized on November 14, 2002. The OCC was in the
midst of consolidating six district offices into four. As a
result of that consolidation, we filed a notice of intent to
bargain for a salary adjustment for relocating employees. OCC
management countered, stating that the union lacked the authority
to bargain over pay and benefits, due to a statute enacted
during the Lincoln era presidency.
On June 24, 2003,
we submitted a petition for review to the Federal Labor
Relations Authority (FLRA), asking them for a ruling. On April
29, 2004, in a split two-to-one decision, the FLRA ruled in
favor of the OCC. On May 17, 2004, a group of disgruntled OCC
employees filed a petition to decertify the NTEU as the OCC’s
union representative. At a subsequent election on December 13,
2004, the NTEU was re-certified by an even larger margin of
victory than in the original election. Clearly, the majority of
employees already recognized the value added by a union
presence.
Despite the
distraction of a recertification and election, NTEU officers
continued their steady pursuit of pay negotiability. During
this period, NTEU sought to appeal the initial FLRA ruling.
Unfortunately, on January 23, 2006, an appeals court also ruled
in the OCC favor. As NTEU was left with no legal remedy, we
almost immediately set out on a campaign to have the legislation
rewritten.
NTEU began by
gathering information under the Freedom of Information Act
(FOIA). Based upon the limited information we received, we
became concerned about the potential for unintentional
discrimination. We began to communicate our concerns to the
established Labor-Management Relations Committee (LMRC). At
those meetings, we were subsequently surprised to learn that the
OCC had never conducted an internal or external analysis of its
pay system to ensure that even unintentional discrimination had
not occurred. We were especially surprised by this fact, as
the FDIC and SEC merit pay systems had recently been determined
to be discriminatory, and the two agencies were ordered to
revise their systems. When it became apparent that these
discussions were accomplishing little, NTEU took the next
progressive step.
We found a
sympathetic ear in Congressman Barney Frank. We began regularly
communicating with his office. We expressed concern about the
OCC’s merit pay system which is highly subjective,
non-transparent, and not supported by a majority of OCC
employees. We also expressed concern that the OCC had not
performed an analysis to determine whether the system
“unintentionally” discriminated against protected classes, but
especially minorities and older employees.
On June 5, 2008
Congressman Barney Frank wrote Comptroller Dugan expressing his
concern about the OCC’s pay system. On July 31, 2008,
Comptroller Dugan responded to the inquiry, stating that the OCC
had undertaken a study of its compensation program.
In early March
2009, numerous OCC employees attended the NTEU Legislative
Conference in Washington DC. At that conference we, along with
union members from the FDIC, SEC and NCUA, were able to meet
with representatives from the Senate Banking Committee and put
forth our ideas and concerns relative to the proposed financial
reform legislation. We provided them with a “white paper” in
which we articulated our ideas. Among those ideas was a
“systemic risk council” and “pay negotiability for OCC
employees.” During that conference, we also met individually
with various members of the Senate Banking Committee and House
Financial Services Committee (HFSC), including Barney Frank who
had now become the HFSC chairman.
That same week in
March 2009, NTEU was informed at a LMRC meeting that a
preliminary report of the compensation program study had finally
been issued. We were disappointed to learn that the review
covered only the most recent fiscal year. We made repeated
requests for the report to be released to us, but without
success. Finally, after being repeatedly rebuffed, NTEU made a
formal FOIA request for the information on August 21, 2009.
Despite a federally-mandated 20 business day turnaround, OCC
“released” portions of the study on October 29, 2009. However,
management redacted virtually all meaningful information
that we could use for analytical purposes.
On December 2,
2009, NTEU filed an appeal to the Comptroller of the Currency
for release of the study. Again after considerable delay, the
OCC management denied the request on March 29, 2010.
Subsequently, in June 2010 NTEU filed a suit against the agency
in Federal Court claiming the unlawful withholding of
information under the Freedom of Information Act.
In March 2010, OCC
employees again attended the NTEU legislative conference in
Washington, DC. This time with backing from SEC, FDIC
and NCUA union leaders, we provided every member on the Senate Banking
Committee and House Financial Services Committee with a copy of
our regulatory reform proposal regarding pay negotiability at
the OCC. Our thrust: the other three FIRREA agencies already
had pay negotiability, so why should OCC be shackled by Civil
War era legislation. Fortunately, our message was clearly
heard.
For the NTEU
members who have been with this process since the beginning, the
wheels of justice and the legislative process really do turn
slowly. However, we have at last achieved our goal. It is a
great day and a great victory for all OCC bargaining unit
employees.
What is Next?
Although it is too
early to know what steps may be taken to rationalize the OCC pay
system, we do know broadly that some events and attitudes will
shape the future. One fact now is that the next Comptroller, to
be nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate, will
no longer have authority to take unilateral action on the pay
and benefits of the bargaining unit, which of course includes
our NTEU members. We hope and trust the next Comptroller
recognizes that negotiated input on the pay system will produce
better results for the OCC, rather than unilateralism.
We recognize that
good-faith bargaining on pay and benefits likely will be part
and parcel of the overall relationship between NTEU and OCC as
it evolves, under a new Comptroller and executive managers who
may stay on or retire. On non-pay matters, pre-decisional
involvement has barely begun to germinate however. It is a
concept that the current administration expects the next
Comptroller to fully embrace. Also, a major transition is about
to occur as OTS employees are integrated into the OCC. We will
see whether the new Comptroller and Executive Committee will aim
at fostering a meaningful partnership with NTEU, to work
collaboratively on the OTS transition and on a myriad of
matters, now including pay and benefits.
OCC bargaining
unit employees should not anticipate significant increases in
pay and benefits. While there are obvious areas that can and
should be improved upon, most OCC employees will generally
concur that our pay and benefits are good. Therefore, we will
strive to maintain what we currently have, while working toward the
possibility of improvement. Our focus will be upon
engagement and equitable treatment of employees. That includes
how merit raises and pay increases are determined. The
transparency must be significantly improved. When an employee
asks their supervisor what they need to do in order to become
“4-rated”; it will no longer be acceptable for the manager to
respond “Well, you just need to keep doing what you have been
doing and work a little harder at it.”
Changes will not
occur overnight and will need to be negotiated through the
bargaining process. NTEU leaders will conduct these
negotiations on behalf of all bargaining unit employees. NTEU
members will have the opportunity to approve or disapprove of
any compensation and benefits contracts that are negotiated with
the OCC. However, all bargaining unit employees will be bound
by those contracts.
Throughout this
process, our goal is to maintain our core values: A seat at the
table, professionalism and fair and equitable treatment of
employees. These are the values that OCC stakeholders have come
to expect and to rely upon.
__________________________________________________________________________________________________
|